Many fans watching the fight saw it differently.
Ramos started well, boxing with poise, countering effectively, and making Davis work for openings. Davis had the pressure and the bigger reputation, but Ramos appeared to bank several of the early and middle rounds with cleaner work and better control at range.
That is where the controversy came in. Two 78-74 cards meant Ramos was credited with only two rounds by those judges, a margin many observers felt did not match the action. Even fans who thought Davis rallied late argued the fight was closer than the official scores suggested.
Davis did have a stronger finish. He pressed more in the later rounds, threw with volume, and found enough success down the stretch to make the fight competitive. That likely carried weight with the judges, especially with Davis fighting on a card built heavily around Cleveland’s young talent.
Still, the reaction afterward centered on Ramos getting a raw deal. Some fans called it a robbery, while others felt a draw would have been more reasonable. The common complaint was not simply that Davis won, but that the scorecards were too favorable for the unbeaten prospect.
For Scooter Davis, the fight still served as a useful step-up test. He went eight hard rounds against an experienced opponent and found a way to win when the knockout did not come.
It was the kind of performance for Ramos that may earn him another opportunity, even in defeat. He pushed Davis harder than the scores suggested and left many fans believing he deserved more from the judges.
Read the full article here