Shakur Stevenson didn’t accept the idea that his win over Teofimo Lopez lacked greatness, brushing it off as criticism rooted in preference rather than performance.
Click Here To Watch Benavidez vs. Zurdo LIVE tonight!
The unbeaten lightweight responded directly after commentator Sean Zittel grouped Stevenson’s fight with other recent bouts he labeled underwhelming.
“I was too dominant my bad but to say that wasn’t a true masterpiece. WOW,” Stevenson posted on X, adding laughing emojis to underline the sarcasm.
Zittel had earlier posted:
“I think both Shakur-Teofimo and Inoue-Nakatani were underwhelming fights. Both are great fighters, but neither fight was a true masterpiece.”
“Crawford-Canelo, Shakur-Teofimo, Inoue-Nakatani, Usyk-Fury, Bivol-Beterbiev. None of these were great fights.”
Zittel tapped into a growing frustration. When you look at the landscape of 2026, the fencing match approach is becoming a tough sell, especially for the blue-collar fans who are shelling out hard-earned money for PPVs.
Shakur had the skills to dominate Teofimo Lopez last January, but by choosing to never step on the gas, he left the fans at MSG booing. It felt like he was more afraid of losing than he was interested in winning big.
Usyk vs. Fury / Bivol vs. Beterbiev were billed as historic clashes, but the heavy emphasis on playing it safe and neutralizing power rather than engaging has left a sour taste. When the biggest names in the sport are content to box to a narrow decision, it drains the energy out of the room.
The sport is losing ground to high-intensity formats because the top guys are too worried about their “0” to take a risk. If you’re paying $70, you don’t want to watch a guy jab and move for 36 minutes; you want a fight.
In the U.S. market, there’s a literal cost to this style. Casual fans want to see “blood, smashed faces, and broken bones,” as Turki Alalshikh said last year, not a 12-round track meet.
Last Updated on 2026/05/02 at 3:20 PM
Read the full article here